I dislike using metaphors and analogiesm but in this case it will make the introduction more palatable. To go straight into the topic will cause a sort of vertigo and some will drop off without getting even a glimpse of what I am trying to say. Take what you can and leave the rest.
Climbing the mountain of spiritual insight is a long and truly pathless hike. It takes most of us years of dedication and practice to gain any headway up the gentlest slopes. As we reach the summit, the obstacles are many and perilous, as many sages have attested to. The area of ascent I want to focus on is that of 'subject and object are one(SOAO).'
Many years ago, while practicing the varied Vispassana techniques, my direct experience of this was certified by the accomplished practitioner assigned to me+. It's pointless to delve into the realization itself so what interests me here is what happens after such experiences. Subject and object becoming One is a direct experience as there is no separation, no observation, and therefore no thing to talk about. There are no thoughts or concepts and no trophies received or postcards to send home. I did mention it is a long climb up e.
If we are fortunate enough, as I was, we have someone to give a frame of reference for the experience. Many I have talked to just freaked out, backed away from meditation practice or sought mental health advice. Some continued on alone and had psychotic breaks. Over the years I have used all of these tactics. Having a guide is helpful to avoid these blind canyons and avalanches on the ascent. Metaphor again.
As I pointed out there is no thing to talk about and yet almost everyone, filled with the after effects of the experience, feels impelled to do so. Having spent so much time being educated and reinforced in the 'reality' that I am me and you are you, this is this and that is that, the substance of subject and object duality, we revert back to it automatically. Therefore, describing SOAO pulls one back into that which we just experienced dissolving and we objectify the experience. Many also set themselves up as guides, teachers and/or gurus without depth of experience or freedom from the pull of conditioning in the world of subject and object thinking. So in discussing SOAO they perpetuate the duality of subject object perspectives somehow expecting others can have a direct experience on oneness from this constant barrage of this and that. It keeps the 'teacher' stuck back in the mind state before the SOAO experience.
SOAO is an experiential state of consciousness that is preintellectual, it exists before the development, use, or application of the intellect, logic, or conscious reasoning. If you haven't experienced it the only way to approach it is through conditioned subject/object frames of mind where we, the subject, create names and forms, objects, through projection and identification. This is the 'real world' of material objects. And it is comforting to maintain a grasp on this frame of mind. It validates who I am.
The way someone who has experienced the SOAO state can cultivate a sense of awareness is to loosen up the learned world of form and names. Discovering a persons direct preintellectual experiences, Aha or wow moments we all have, and helping to weave those together is a great tool. Also acknowledging when a person is having a preintellectual moment in our presence also creates an experiential link. Everyone has the look of discovery, eyes wider and happier, when these occur. Reinforcing the value of these is key to pursuing more and more of these moments until the question arises "Why do I want to stray so far from this?!"
e And this is the slippery slope of talking about SOAO leading into ego entanglement.
m All metaphors and analogies must collapse into Truth at some point or other if they are useful.
* I suspect the reason for Pope Francis' devotion to Our Lady of Knots has a similar attraction.
+ We have a great aversion to using Guru, Sage or Enlightened One these days. Suffice it to say they knew more than I did at the time.







